Covid Its All About Money
Over a year since the start of the pandemic, the efficacy of various vaccines and vaccinations and the end of Lockdowns grab global headlines. It's been months without any clamor for the answer to the most critical questions of our time: What and Where is the source of Covid?
We have had in the interim a dedicated WHO team of specialists visit Wuhan. Still, they were handpicked and either didn't or were not permitted to ask or get comprehensive information.
It's been clearly documented some members of the investigating team had, in any case, serious conflicts of interest with the entities they were meant to be investigating.
No surprises there.
If there’s so much evidence pointing toward a lab origin, why are leading health authorities and scientists dismissing it all and insisting SARS-CoV-2 is a natural occurrence, mysterious as it might be?
The answer undoubtedly comes down to money.
Should the COVID-19 pandemic be officially recognized as the result of a lab accident, the world might be forced to take a cold hard look at gain-of-function research that allows for creating these new pathogens. The result would ideally be the banning of such research worldwide, which means tens of thousands of researchers would lose their jobs. Prestigious careers would be spoiled.
On top of that, the culprits might face criminal charges under the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, and nations [China] might be held financially responsible for the economic destruction caused by the pandemic around the globe. These are not minor issues and provide ample incentive to cover up the truth.
As Rutgers microbiologist and founding member of the Cambridge Working Group, Richard Ebright told Boston Magazine:
“For the substantial subset of virologists who perform gain-of-function research, avoiding restrictions on research funding, avoiding implementation of appropriate biosafety standards, and avoiding implementation of appropriate research oversight are powerful motivators.”
Antonio Regalado, the biomedicine editor of MIT Technology Review, was even blunter, stating that if SARS-CoV-2 was found to be a lab creation, “it would shatter the scientific edifice top to bottom.” There’s little doubt that this is the reason why the lab origin theory has been roundly labeled as pure conspiracy theory spread by science deniers and Trump flag wielding kooks.
Such a stance is exceptionally unhealthy, however, as it seeks to strangle not only free speech but also scientific inquiry and “criminalizes” logic in general.
In a February 15, 2021, AP News article, the three authors identify several professors and organizations as “superspreaders” of disinformation about SARS-CoV-2’s origin.
Among them are Francis Boyle, a bioweapons expert who drafted the 1989 Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, Luc Montagnier, a world-renowned virologist who won the Nobel prize for his discovery of HIV, and the Center for Research on Globalization. The remainder are individuals and organizations that are unknown in the scientific community.
According to AP, the parties on this list have no training in virology (apparently, Nobel prize-winning virologists aren’t good enough) and therefore do not have the expertise to speak on the issue of viral origins. However, they don’t mention the many who have presented evidence for a lab origin who do have all the “right” credentials. It's hard to believe a more contrived and false narrative.
It’s also worth noting that the AP article was produced in collaboration with the Atlantic Council, which is part of the technocratic hub using the pandemic to further its Great Reset agenda. That alone qualifies the article as pure globalist propaganda.
If SARS-CoV-2 resulted from zoonotic spillover, the easiest and most effective way to quash “conspiracy theories” about a lab origin would be to present compelling evidence for a plausible theory.
So far, that hasn’t happened, and as noted by Latham and Wilson, the most likely reason for that is because the virus does not have a natural zoonotic origin, and You Cannot Find That Which Does Not Exist.